Policy search>missing structure rel. weight

[carieh]

Testing lab 6 version 6.0.3.4
I am missing a value for cod larvae in the structure rel. weight under the objectives tab. All other values are correct, and cod is a multistanza group, but this value goes missing.

[joeb]

This seems to be OK in my version so can you re-test this with the next build

[carieh]

version 6.0.3.7
There is still a discrepency. I re-loaded the model to double check the error. If you load in model Lab 4- Ecosim scenario cod-Seal and go to fishing policy search tab. Objectives> rel. structure weight> for cod larvae the weighting should be 0.2 (as in version 5), but in version 6 it is still 0. I am not sure if this is a multistanza issue or an importing issue

[joeb]

Carie
I've loaded Fish501.mdb Ecosim scenario Cod Seals into both EwE5 and EwE6 and both version have Cod-Larvae Structure rel. weight = 0 in the fishing policy search interface???? The only group with a Structure rel. weight = 0.2 is Benthos. Beats me what is going on here

[carieh]

Hi Joe, Still having trouble here. I have sent an email with some images that might help you see the issue. I am in version 6.0.3.14 now, and still having issues. Not sure why you are getting ok results????

[joeb]

Hi Carie May 30
I think this is finally fixed. I have looked at this in a couple of models and it seems to be working after build 6.0.3.14

[carieh]

Version 6.0.3.18
there is still an issue with the groups mentioned previously. I have just re-imported model Lab 5 and looked at it in version 5 and 6, and for some reason the structure relative weight for cod larvae is still 0 in version 6.
Sorry

[joeb]

Hi Carie
In the version of Fish501 Cod Seals that I have Cod-Larvae is zero in the fishing policy search Structure rel. weight. (both 5 and 6). Can you send me a database that shows this behavior in both versions.
joe

[carieh]

Hi again Joe :-)
see email on the 24th of sept with more images!
Still happening

[joeb]

Hi I finally got this to show up in my version. We are just going to ignore it. It's just a rounding issue and the value is not that important.
Joe