Custom Query (1539 matches)
Results (10 - 12 of 1539)
Ticket | Resolution | Summary | Owner | Reporter |
---|---|---|---|---|
#1003 | fixed | remarks in EwE | jeroens | sylvieg |
Description |
trying to include remarks in a cell (basic input). It use to be that we could add to a comment by adding a new line (pressing enter) and start writing. Now I am stuck on the last line written and there is a limit of characters that can be entered apparently. This cramps my style :-) |
|||
#414 | fixed | remarks bar does not have scroll option | administrator | carieh |
Description |
if you peg the remarks tab up to read comments, there is no scroll bar to let you know how far down your comments go. I tend to write a lot so basically you have to use arrows. Not a big deal, but sometimes you forget how much is in the cell. Hmm, interesting, there is a scroll bar on my machine. And it is in the code ;) However, you might be having an issue with the dock panel layout; I am not sure. I'd love to see a snapshot of your screen. I'll email you mine. |
|||
#150 | repoened | reading 0s in time series instead of missing values | administrator | carieh |
Description |
So for the time-series data, I think one big difference is that version 6 assumes the value to be 0 if you have left it out (in the .csv file). I dont think version 5 does this. So with version 6 I have these big spikes and valleys, and in version 5 I just have a few scattered dots. The biomass is not going to 0 in these years, there is just a missing value for this year (i.e. I dont have data for every year. I am not sure if this is the best way to represent this, as the general trends are quite different in these 2 scenarios. This is from the Antarctic model. I have screen shots that show the difference in the two versions, but I think it is very important that missing values do NOT get changed into 0's. Images are in Aug 16 notes. Time series will be displayed as scatter graphs after version 6.0.0.16 |