Custom Query (1539 matches)

I think the best improvement for Ecosim would be to include a formal sensitivity analyses. As it is said in the Ecopath user guide Ecosim does not (yet!) include any formal sensitivity analysis. Ecosim includes a Monte Carlo routine, but it is not possible to save the results of each run, only the best solution when the runs includes time series fitting. Probably they are already working to include such formal sensitivity analysis, whatever it means, and it will be very much appreciated, since the first question that people use to ask is How about the paramters uncertainty?

From: Hart, Professor P.J.B. pbh@… Sent: November 29, 2005 1:06 PM To: f.gao@… Subject: EwE

I said I'd contact my PhD student who has been using Ecopath with Ecosim to seem if he had any suggestions for improvement.

He wrote the following:

Best wishes.

Paul Hart

Professor Paul J B Hart Department of Biology University of Leicester University Road Leicester LE1 7RH UK

Tel: +44 (0)116 252 3348 Fax: +44 (0)116 252 3330 ​http://www.le.ac.uk/biology/staff/blpbh.htm

'Fish and Fisheries' website: ​http://www.blackwell-science.com/faf/

'Handbook of Fish Biology and Fisheries' (2002) ​http://www.blackwell-science.com/~cgilib/bookpage.bin?File=10014891

I just had a quick question regarding Finn's cycling index calculations in 5.1. It seems that I cannot generate these numbers from my models. Previous versions seemed to calculate them just fine.

From: Fayram, Andrew Andrew.Fayram@… Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 6:22 AM

Spatial framework is not ready for public release. Next one.